0 posts & replies
@Xrave Please elaborate how the tree is a problem, the MGW200 worked fine and the MGW310 is having issues. What does the tree matter? The MGW200 data proves a device should be 98% RRR in that exact location. Are you saying it is know that the MGW310 is not as good at GEODNET at the MGW200?
Sounds like an excuse for a defective product to me.
FYI, I am not the only one reporting this type of issue. There are 2 more on this exact thread and i have seen other threads where people have had similar issues.
From what i can tell, the MGW310 is a crap shoot, some work well and some do not. There has already been 1 recall due to static build up and now there is this new issue of poor GEODNET performance.
Also my MGW310 is only a few unit numbers outside the recalled batch.
i appreciate your comments, but am getting very frustrated that an $1100 product is not functioning properly and the only response i get is “Got a Picture” when actual data already exists to prove the product is defective. :(
@Xrave Yes, exact same location. i unscrewed the mgw200 from the all thread and screwed on the mgw310.
I don’t have pics yet. it is installed on the side of a 1 story house using 3ft all thread. The unit sticks up above the peak of the house. There is 1 tree partially blocking the south west view of the sky, but otherwise no obstructions.
@Xrave yes it is always blue. has been up for over 2 weeks now and same bad graph.
it is doing good at wingbits, just the geodnet side of the device is defective.
